Lotus Buddhism / FAQ / The Buddhist Philosophy of Value

The Buddhist Philosophy of Value

Values give direction to our inclinations and behaviour. The basic question about ‘good’ and ‘evil’ paved the way for a wider investigation about human ‘values’. Values are perceived as being important, worthy and desirable in daily experience. Despite the great number of qualities, which can be defined as valuable, a shared view - in both eastern and western philosophies - considers a number of three values as the most influential in people’s life.

The Western System of Value

Western thinking was greatly influenced by the 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant, whose work focused on ethics, morality and virtue. Further development of his work led philosophers to adopt a neo-Kantian system of 3 basic values, being:

Good, Beauty and Truth, as what essentially influences and motivates people.

While ‘Beauty’ and ‘Good’ are accepted in general as being essential values, considering “Truth” as a value was questioned by various philosophers. Truth is consdiered as an objective fact, rather than a subjective value.  Additionally, what people some believe or consider as “truth” is questionable by others and this question can be quite controversial.  (For hundreds of years, the “Truth” people believed in was that the Sun rotates around the Earth).

Value relates always to human activity (to create something worthy and important): this was the view of Japanese educator Tsunesaburo Makiguchi (1871-1944). Makiguchi’s view was that “Good” and “Beauty” can be created by people, and therefore can be considered as essential values, “Truth”, however, cannot be  “produced” by human activity.  “Truth” reveals objective facts, while “Value” - on the other hand - relates to a subjective human activity.

For example, a statement of fact - such as: “this is a flower” describes an objective “truth”, (about the existence of the object, being a flower) - while a statement of value: “this flower is beautiful” describes a subjective impression - a result of an evaluation of the impact of the object on one’s perception.

Instead of the “Truth” as a value, Makiguchi suggested the “Application of the Truth” - or the Benefit gained through its practical application.   There is no disagreement among people about the value of the benefit gained from inventions such as cars, computers, medical instruments, etc… The impact of benefit on society and making life better - is undeniably a desirable and important value.

Eastern System of Value

Makiguchi was the founder of the Value Creation Society (1930), known as the Soka movement  (the Japanese  word Soka means ‘creation of value’).   The Soka system of values considers

Good, Beauty and Benefit, as what essentially influences and motivates people.

This perspective shares the values of Good and Beauty with the suggested system in Western philosophy, however, it introduces the concept of ‘Benefit-to-society’ as the third value.  Benefit (or gain) is understood as actions leading to progress and advancement of individual’s and society’s life.

According to SGI literature, “value” is that which can be created and developed: “the capacity to find meaning, to enhance one’s own existence and contribute to the well-being of others, under any circumstance.”

The Impact of Values on Society

Motivated by Goodness, Beauty and Benefit, people’s activities influence their lives and that of others.  Because of the interconnectedness of individual and society, the goal of creating benefit for social good cannot be maintained by sacrificing the individual. Overriding the individual’s interest goes against the impartial bond of interconnectedness (as is the case with the implication of Utilitarianism, which can lead to preference or bias towards the benefit of the majority of people on account of many individuals from social minorities).

Buddhist philosopher , Daisaku Ikeda explains that, ‘benefit’ becomes a value only if it includes the wellbeing of self and others:

“A life devoted to benefiting others represents Great Good” .  D. Ikeda Lecture on “The Dragon Gate” writing - March 2008 Daibyakurenge 

“Of two people making comparable efforts, the results will differ greatly if one person is motivated by a value that transcends the self— (good, beauty, the well-being of others) —while the contrary is motivated by ego”.

“In his theory of value, President Makiguchi … clearly stated that gain that does not benefit the public interest is evil and anti-value. Without a system of values to guide economic activities, economics becomes devoted to nothing more than making money… There is a danger that such a situation will spin out of control.” The Wisdom of the Lotus Sutra 4 p 127


To create values of Good, Beauty and Benefit in any sphere of life, action is required. Obviously, a negative action - leading for example to destruction or deformation - will create the opposite impact, becoming anti-value:

“However, value is called evil, loss or ugliness according to the kind and degree to which it is recognised as being harmful to the maintenance of life”. Makiguchi, the Value Creator , page 52

The consequences or the practical results of one’s action (whether it leads to happiness and progress or to destruction and sufferings) - is the criterion for verifying whether the nature of a given action was that of value or anti-value.

Definition of Good:

Eastern philosophical perspectives define Good as actions, which lead to removing sufferings or harm, and also that of imparting harmony and joy:

“… the word for compassion comprises two Chinese characters.  The first character corresponds to the Sanskrit word maitri, meaning “to give happiness.” The second corresponds to the Sanskrit karuna, meaning “to remove suffering. Taken together they describe the function of relieving living beings of suffering and giving them happiness.”

This perspective gives a simple and direct definition of values in terms of their impact:

Good: removing sufferings and imparting happiness.

Evil : causing suffering and harm.

Beauty: creating harmony and satisfaction of the senses.

Ugliness: disharmony, deformation and unpleasantness.

Benefit: progress, betterment and advancement (of society and individual).

Loss:, disunity, decline and destruction in people’s life.

Makiguchi explains that Goodness (removing sufferings) and Benefit are interconnected:

Makiguchi defined “Good” as something contributing toward or providing public benefit”. (The Wisdom of the Lotus Sutra 3 p 81).

and that:

“That which has a harmful influence on the social fabric, or destroys social institutions, is called evil” Newsletter 5097, 9 Aug.2002

Differing views between Kant’s and Soka’s implications of Values

In regard to the Kantnian view on “virtue”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy refers to Kant’s doubts about the consistency between “virtue” and “personal well being and happiness”:

“Unfortunately, Kant noted, virtue does not ensure wellbeing and may even conflict with it”.

This view comes in contrast to the Buddhist statement on the subject:

“ From the standpoint of the philosophy of value creation, individual happiness and social prosperity ….are closely related” The Wisdom of the Lotus S.4 p 114

It is important also to note that the emphasis on “removing suffering and imparting joy” – as a direct and practical meaning of Good - differs from Kant’s definition of Goodness, referring to Good as  ‘good will to fulfil one’s duty’:

“The only thing that is good […]  is a good will”. This statement, however, does not define what ‘Good’ is; it simply suggests that ‘good’ is ‘good will’.

Creating Value is creating Happiness

While values are a driving force of motivation for action, it is imperative to view the effect of applying or creating value in the reality of daily life. The three values of Good, Beauty and Benefit are not abstract goals in themselves, but serve to create the ultimate goal of happiness:

- “Happiness, as used by Makiguchi, refers to a state of man’s life when he is engaged in the process of attaining and creating value”. Makiguchi, The Value Creator page 56

- “For Makiguchi, the ability to create value was synonymous with happiness. “Happiness” was, for Makiguchi, the very purpose of education, and the very purpose of life.” 

-  “ From the standpoint of the philosophy of value creation, individual happiness and social prosperity ….are closely related”. The Wisdom of the Lotus Sutra  4 p 114

What is the “highest good”?

The Lotus Sutra presents the concept of ‘aspiration for the highest good’ - as the ‘Great Desire’ of enlightenment.  The “Great Desire” is to act to lessen sufferings of humanity and lead people to Enlightenment, a state of the highest possible good one can offer.

In his reference to the philosophical question: “What is the highest good?” - D. Ikeda states that “The highest good is to help people open up the world of Enlightenment in their lives and forge global solidarity of good will” The Wisdom of the Lotus Sutra  3 p 90

In practical terms, Ikeda points to the highest good on the individual’s level as:

“To repay one’s debts of gratitude is the highest of goodness” The Hope-Filled teachings of Nichiren Daishonin p.222. World Tribune Press 2009. ISBN 978-1-932911-96-1

Referring to the highest good as repaying the debts of gratitude - is based on acknowledgement of the fact that the sheer existence of any individual human being has been possible only as the result of compassion and benefits experienced through family and society - to which one essentially belongs (and without whom the individual cannot exist).  Hence, working for creation of value within people’s lives is how the highest goodness is expressed in real actions.